Starman
Adventurer
Warp Demon said:Good thing I converted the swimming pool into a bomb shelter eh?
Don't forget the can opener.
Starman
Warp Demon said:Good thing I converted the swimming pool into a bomb shelter eh?
Starman said:Don't forget the can opener.
Starman
Telperion said:My guess is around 2009 or 2010.
Other than that: how about using the SRD 3.5, if you don't feel like giving some money for the actual books? I'm using the SRD pretty much whenever when I'm not at home, which seems to be all the time these days, and it works out quite nicely .
The last time this topic came up, I know I said 2006-2007, with the reasoning behind that being that Hasbro, liking the CCG business model so much that it has applied it to D&D.MerricB said:Not much of a clue.
The best guess anyone has at the moment is possibly 2007, more likely 2008, and likely not even then.
arche said:It's stable enough for me. 2.0 was driving me nuts and that's why I went on hiatus.
Buzzardo said:Are there many hard core 2nd edition fans?
arscott said:3rd ed is definately not unstable.
That's the reason WotC keeps the RPGA around. If you're playing an RPGA game, you'll have to convert when 4.0 comes out. They'll just dump any of the Living campaigns that don't convert. And it seems that RPGA games (like Living Greyhawk) had an explosion of popularity when 3.0 came out. I see a lot more people playing RPGA games than I ever did before D&D 3.0 hit the stores.arche said:It's not even worth worrying about. I got the 3.5 for some reason, but I won't convert to another version until I'm really tired of this one.