Thinking about it, there's really not. I think all classes would lend themselves well to a single class game. Depending on the class chosen, I think it also opens up a few options for type of campaign. Rogues could be members of a thieves guild planning heists, wizards of a wizard academy searching out planar secrets, druids defending nature, barbarians raiding civilisation.I once ran an all bards game (it was only a one shot, not a campaign) in 2E when the 'complete bards handbook' came out. Although, the bard kits were all so diverse that they really all did feel like different classes.
Seems like most people are fine with doing a single class party.
If you answered 'Yes', is there any specific class that you wouldn't want to play in such a game?
I would love to run or run in a game filled with wizards, that would be awesome.
Thinking about it, there's really not. I think all classes would lend themselves well to a single class game. Depending on the class chosen, I think it also opens up a few options for type of campaign. Rogues could be members of a thieves guild planning heists, wizards of a wizard academy searching out planar secrets, druids defending nature, barbarians raiding civilisation.
Some or even all of these could be run with a mixed class party but it would really fit well with a single class party.
That would definitely provide a bit more survivability.Did that in AD&D. Started at level 18.
I would LOVE to play in such a game! Maybe not a 2-year campaign, but something like a 20-sessions arc, that would be awesome.Would you ever play in or run a game with all the PCs being of a single class?
I am just curious as in the way back when times when I payed D&D this didn't seem to be a big deal, whereas nowadays it does.
Please feel free to tell me to get bent!