Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Judge) Judges gather here, please...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GnomeWorks" data-source="post: 1840593" data-attributes="member: 162"><p>No problem. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I like LEW, and I've been involved since the beginning - I want it to continue to grow as much as anybody else.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That shouldn't be a problem. We have enough judges that it shouldn't be an issue if one or two of us isn't comfortable judging proposals.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree. The non-deity proposals are nice, but we should focus on those for now.</p><p></p><p>The map is also important. It seems like we have a few different ones floating around (there's the rough Scorpio did, and there's the close-up of the region around Orussus, but I think that's about it).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that the map will be good for the lay of the land idea. However, having a single source for location descriptions and the various main cities wouldn't be a bad idea, either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I concur. However, most of the deities thus far have been statted out using the great wheel, and it's also the most familiar cosmology. Some modifications wouldn't hurt, though, and would help lend flavor.</p><p></p><p>I think that making the cosmology after we have all the deities we need would be a good idea - that way we can make a cosmology that fits the deities, rather than the other way around (since we went with deities first, as opposed to planes).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hrm... I don't think this is that big a deal. While it would be helpful, I don't know if this is imperative. For now, I think we're fine... if we continue growing, though, it may become necessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Character retirement would be a good one, though we have a base idea to work with right now.</p><p></p><p>Non-standard races have been discussed, but I don't recall any rule being set into place. We'll need to figure that one out.</p><p></p><p>Also, I think we need to work out character death and what happens when that occurs. We should figure out guidelines regarding raising and resurrection, deity intervention, creation of a new character after one dies (for example, does it follow the same rules as character retirement, or different ones?), and so on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The password is floating around somewhere...</p><p></p><p>On the same topic, we may want to consider asking if we can make the judges moderaters for the forum. It'll certainly make pruning a lot easier, and we can update things that were posted by earlier judges that have since disappeared.</p><p></p><p>So, it sounds like our current plan of action is</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Finish approving/disapproving deity proposals.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Get a map done.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Get a campaign compendium done.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I think that's enough to work with for now. Once we get those done, we should move on to the next items.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GnomeWorks, post: 1840593, member: 162"] No problem. :) I like LEW, and I've been involved since the beginning - I want it to continue to grow as much as anybody else. That shouldn't be a problem. We have enough judges that it shouldn't be an issue if one or two of us isn't comfortable judging proposals. I agree. The non-deity proposals are nice, but we should focus on those for now. The map is also important. It seems like we have a few different ones floating around (there's the rough Scorpio did, and there's the close-up of the region around Orussus, but I think that's about it). I think that the map will be good for the lay of the land idea. However, having a single source for location descriptions and the various main cities wouldn't be a bad idea, either. I concur. However, most of the deities thus far have been statted out using the great wheel, and it's also the most familiar cosmology. Some modifications wouldn't hurt, though, and would help lend flavor. I think that making the cosmology after we have all the deities we need would be a good idea - that way we can make a cosmology that fits the deities, rather than the other way around (since we went with deities first, as opposed to planes). Hrm... I don't think this is that big a deal. While it would be helpful, I don't know if this is imperative. For now, I think we're fine... if we continue growing, though, it may become necessary. Character retirement would be a good one, though we have a base idea to work with right now. Non-standard races have been discussed, but I don't recall any rule being set into place. We'll need to figure that one out. Also, I think we need to work out character death and what happens when that occurs. We should figure out guidelines regarding raising and resurrection, deity intervention, creation of a new character after one dies (for example, does it follow the same rules as character retirement, or different ones?), and so on. The password is floating around somewhere... On the same topic, we may want to consider asking if we can make the judges moderaters for the forum. It'll certainly make pruning a lot easier, and we can update things that were posted by earlier judges that have since disappeared. So, it sounds like our current plan of action is [list] [*] Finish approving/disapproving deity proposals. [*] Get a map done. [*] Get a campaign compendium done.[/list] I think that's enough to work with for now. Once we get those done, we should move on to the next items. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
(Judge) Judges gather here, please...
Top