Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Ben Riggs talks about Why WotC tried to cancel the OGL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8960922" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>It makes all the sense in the world that it was really about potential money being left on the table. Especially when you consider that there's no way to accurately calculate just how much the availability of the OGL has increased the popularity of the base game (and the money made by WotC from it) versus the money they don't get because it's going to those 3rd Party producers. Because it's not like WotC could make a 1-for-1 comparison and say "That 1 Million Dollar Kickstarter would have been money that would have come to us if that Kickstarter otherwise wasn't a thing." We know that's not true in the least-- that million dollars would not in any way have made its way to WotC if the Kickstarter (and it through the OGL) didn't exist, because WotC would still have needed to produce something to warrant bringing in those million dollars.</p><p></p><p>But I'm sure there were folks at Hasbro that just didn't get that. They probably just thought indeed that every dollar spent on a 3PP was a dollar that wasn't coming to WotC that otherwise would have. And no matter how many times folks in the D&D department would tell them "D&D is only AS BIG AS IT IS currently BECAUSE the OGL has allowed everyone to grow-- a rising tide lifts all boats-- so putting an end to that will not actually benefit us!"... the money people probably just wouldn't accept it.</p><p></p><p>Now granted... it's way too simple to just point to the numbers and say "See what the sales of 2E and 4E were <em>without</em> an OGL versus the sales of 3E and 5E WITH an OGL? This is why the OGL has been great for us!" because correlation does not imply causation. But at the same time it was the most evidence the D&D team had to at least have SOMETHING to point to. Until of course then the implosion of January 2023 occurred and gave even more evidence to the problem of what removing the OGL would result in.</p><p></p><p>And look... quite frankly I understand the money people's argument. I don't think it's a <em>very good</em> argument, and was not nearly worth arguing for... but I understand why they made it. But thankfully those people were put in their place about it.</p><p></p><p>The lesson to learn from all of this is "If you want to make a lot of money... just make something people really want. Don't try to just skim off of other people's work. You're not going to make nearly enough to warrant all the hassle."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8960922, member: 7006"] It makes all the sense in the world that it was really about potential money being left on the table. Especially when you consider that there's no way to accurately calculate just how much the availability of the OGL has increased the popularity of the base game (and the money made by WotC from it) versus the money they don't get because it's going to those 3rd Party producers. Because it's not like WotC could make a 1-for-1 comparison and say "That 1 Million Dollar Kickstarter would have been money that would have come to us if that Kickstarter otherwise wasn't a thing." We know that's not true in the least-- that million dollars would not in any way have made its way to WotC if the Kickstarter (and it through the OGL) didn't exist, because WotC would still have needed to produce something to warrant bringing in those million dollars. But I'm sure there were folks at Hasbro that just didn't get that. They probably just thought indeed that every dollar spent on a 3PP was a dollar that wasn't coming to WotC that otherwise would have. And no matter how many times folks in the D&D department would tell them "D&D is only AS BIG AS IT IS currently BECAUSE the OGL has allowed everyone to grow-- a rising tide lifts all boats-- so putting an end to that will not actually benefit us!"... the money people probably just wouldn't accept it. Now granted... it's way too simple to just point to the numbers and say "See what the sales of 2E and 4E were [I]without[/I] an OGL versus the sales of 3E and 5E WITH an OGL? This is why the OGL has been great for us!" because correlation does not imply causation. But at the same time it was the most evidence the D&D team had to at least have SOMETHING to point to. Until of course then the implosion of January 2023 occurred and gave even more evidence to the problem of what removing the OGL would result in. And look... quite frankly I understand the money people's argument. I don't think it's a [I]very good[/I] argument, and was not nearly worth arguing for... but I understand why they made it. But thankfully those people were put in their place about it. The lesson to learn from all of this is "If you want to make a lot of money... just make something people really want. Don't try to just skim off of other people's work. You're not going to make nearly enough to warrant all the hassle." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Ben Riggs talks about Why WotC tried to cancel the OGL
Top