Search results

Thats different than a mission statement.

Index placement is a big one too. My battletech sources drive me nuts. They place a dozen or more game sheets after the index. 🤦‍♂️

That sounds like a comment more worried about what the internet thinks and not what their actual playgroup does.

The reboot is better.

I dont even use physical books anymore so I really dont notice length. My test is at the table. If an occasional reference check is necessary (after a few rounds of learning the game of course) that seems about right to me.

I wonder how many folks read that and say, “yeah…not me.”?

Eh, whaaddya gonna do? They barely publish anything anymore.

Thats about what Saltmarsh got in 3E DMG II and it has been my favorite D&D GM guide ever.

Im in.

You have to watch Pudsy's x-mas for 94 min first.

WB

I thought it was called Groghawk?

Legacy. You may think a new direction is necessary to attract and keep newer players, but legacy is a strong attraction. I know when I started D&D I didnt want it to fit my perception of what was hip, I wanted to know its history.

Its a good picture, but a little too matte for my taste. Wish it was a little more dynamic. Though, its a good adventure party with an old school feel.

Sure I also notice a lot of "Insert game does X in a Y way, but I prefer X done in a Z way; therefore insert game sucks". Having some awareness about your preferences is a good thing.

PF2 uses a +/level design which means you get a +1 to everything for every level. The crit/fail system uses a 10 under or over DC. So, when a challenge for a level X party is determined by the rule set, its very accurate, unlike numerous CR systems of D&D editions or swingy type systems. The...

A friend sent me the beta rules. I read them but never tried them. My impression is it was an attempt to take 5E and add a little 4E/PF2 to it.

Yeap. Try this in PF2 and you will be making new PCs on a regular basis.