Search results

no, but the feature says ‘specifically you know the local messengers who can deliver messages for you’, so don’t pretend like the only focus is the contact here. We both simply allow the contact to be reached by other means too, if feasible sure it has, the question has always been about...

it's probably more that it aligns better with '5 year old' than with 'Hobbit' to me ;)

so you mean more muscular? I saw that as still having some baby fat ;)

also https://nordgamesllc.com/product/the-ultimate-guide-to-alchemy-crafting-enchanting-pdf-5e/ https://nordgamesllc.com/product/the-ultimate-guide-to-foraging-harvesting-natural-discovery-pdf-5e/ https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cubicle-7-games/vault-5e-crafting-and-alchemy

larger or hairy feet? Right now the difference to a human is that you do not expect a 5 year old to be an adventurer, that is not really much of a distinction either, depending on the scene you want to depict

and that is why I am not so sure I want it to be technical again rather than just better natural writing ;)

that is not what the feature says (local...), despite you ignoring that, but yes, that is what the discussion is about, where are messengers available.... somehow I thought that was clear 200 pages ago...

that is flat out wrong, I repeatedly said they would have an easier time identifying criminals and establishing connections the background, yes, the feature, no, it is entirely irrelevant to what I described above. The feature however means that in your local region you already have established...

https://www.enworld.org/threads/mcdms-flee-mortals-now-on-dndbeyond.704197/

they use a more complex one internally than the DMG contains from what I recall, do not remember anything about it not working

wasn’t that encounter building rather than CR

did they promise that everything will be under an open license? To me the comparison was between an SRD under the then soon to be OGL1.1 vs one under something closer to 1.0, and at that time the latter would be more open. I am not aware of it being about all content at all. better relative to...

I am pretty sure I have a better idea about what I am opposed to than you do… Given that I even pointed this out as an alternative to the feature in areas where the feature does not work, I am certain I am not opposing this, it just yet again has nothing to do with the feature. except that you...

I said I agree with what you wrote, not sure what is unclear about it the conditions being that everyone at the table agrees? yes, in that case there is no problem. The problem is that none of what is being discussed here meets that premise, if everyone at the table were in agreement, then...

apparently you also skip over the bits where I write that I do not care about RAW, I care about it making sense and being explainable... none of this has anything to do with the feature, so yeah, if this was not about automatically recognizing this, then I do not understand why you brought it...

I’d like that, as it opens up another front. So far we got adventures and monsters, character options would be a nice addition too, there are several books out there they could add

yes, I expect them to be in the core books, heroes in the PHB, villains like Strahd and Soth in the DMG. I was thinking beyond the books, recognition and interest on a much larger level, like Luke or Vader from Star Wars or Gandalf from LotR, something that can get an audience interested in a...

I agree, but at the same time TSR published a ton of books, they could have managed to have some recognizable characters (Drizzt, Raistlin, …) to garner interest I believe they want such characters now, but they will need a hugely successful movie to establish them at this point

agreed, there is a limit to it, but the criminal background could definitely have been clearer about its scope / what local means that is true, I am more interested in avoiding misunderstandings with this