• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D (2024) We’ll be merging the One D&D and D&D forums shortly


log in or register to remove this ad


Sure and it was 2.5e. It was as you note, a STEP towards third edition and not enough to be a new edition on its own. We have had only 5 editions of AD&D. 1e, 2e, 3e, 4e and now 5e. The rest have been half edition changes at most, and barely a change at all in some cases.
I never heard about 2.5e when we played it. I actually did not realize there was a first edition before. For us it was always just AD&D.
I was confused when we played "stronghold" back then and elf and halflings were classes...

So even though we were total nerdy players, all that knowledge was just so obscure for us.
And probably for most players out there, however we name it just does not matter.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
I never heard about 2.5e when we played it. I actually did not realize there was a first edition before. For us it was always just AD&D.
I was confused when we played "stronghold" back then and elf and halflings were classes...

So even though we were total nerdy players, all that knowledge was just so obscure for us.
And probably for most players out there, however we name it just does not matter.
Sure. If your table wants to call 5.5e "jojo Plays Baseball," go for it. On the individual and table levels of the game the names don't matter at all. However, when discussing in a larger group like an online forum which versions are an edition and which are not, names and designations do matter to that discussion.

AD&D has had 5 and only 5 editions. Basic and it's various lines were not editions of AD&D, so they do not count towards the edition numbers. Similarly, the expansions/half editions were not editions and do not count towards the edition numbers.
 

Sure. If your table wants to call 5.5e "jojo Plays Baseball," go for it. On the individual and table levels of the game the names don't matter at all. However, when discussing in a larger group like an online forum which versions are an edition and which are not, names and designations do matter to that discussion.

AD&D has had 5 and only 5 editions. Basic and it's various lines were not editions of AD&D, so they do not count towards the edition numbers. Similarly, the expansions/half editions were not editions and do not count towards the edition numbers.
But it does not matter if it is just 5e with errata/updates, 5.5e, 6e, D&D 2024. We had two precedents for roughly the amount of changes we are presented now: 1e -> 2e and 3.0 -> 3.5e

So calling it D&D 2024 is at least factually correct. The other three options are more an individual preference.

Or D&D 10^3 + 2^10
Or D&D 1000(10) + 10000000000(2)
Or D&D 1000(10) + 400(16)
 
Last edited:

TwoSix

"Diegetics", by L. Ron Gygax
Sure. If your table wants to call 5.5e "jojo Plays Baseball," go for it.
"You thought it was D&D 5.5, but it was me, Dio!"

dio.gif
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
But it does not matter if it is just 5e with errata/updates, 5.5e, 6e, D&D 2024. We had two precedents for roughly the amount of changes we are presented now: 1e -> 2e and 3.0 -> 3.5e

So calling it D&D 2024 is at least factually correct. The other three options are more an individual preference.
It does matter. D&D 2024 gets rid of 5e and there would be no current numbered edition of the game. 6e creates a new numbered edition. 5.5e is the only truly accurate name there as it keeps the edition numbering intact, and since what we have seen isn't even remotely close to being a new edition, 6e would be a bad name for it. Further, D&D 2024 will cause confusion since it is no longer 5e, but is functionally the same game as 5e. Creating confusion in your players is bad. 5.5e is accurate and creates no confusion.
 

It does matter. D&D 2024 gets rid of 5e and there would be no current numbered edition of the game. 6e creates a new numbered edition. 5.5e is the only truly accurate name there as it keeps the edition numbering intact, and since what we have seen isn't even remotely close to being a new edition, 6e would be a bad name for it.
I agree with you that it is rather 5.5e than 6e.
Further, D&D 2024 will cause confusion since it is no longer 5e, but is functionally the same game as 5e.
I agree.
Creating confusion in your players is bad. 5.5e is accurate and creates no confusion.
I think my players are even less confused if we still call it 5e (revised). Only one of them remembers that there was 3.5.

A few of my players have not been born when 3.x was an edition. So it certainly does not help them at all if we call it 5.5.
All they know is D&D (5e) and as I told you in my post before: when I was their age, we really were not aware tgere is something else or was something else.

So whatever it is called, it will be D&D for them.
 

Echohawk

Shirokinukatsukami fan
AD&D has had 5 and only 5 editions. Basic and it's various lines were not editions of AD&D, so they do not count towards the edition numbers. Similarly, the expansions/half editions were not editions and do not count towards the edition numbers.
I appreciate the enthusiasm in that very absolute claim, but...

Screenshot 2024-02-20 at 17.41.16.jpg


This 1999 product:
  • Has a rules system clearly developed from the AD&D 2nd Edition rules (so it isn't excluded by your insistence that Basic and its offshoots don't count).
  • Also has a rules system that isn't quite the same as AD&D 2nd Edition or 3rd Edition, but a weird hybrid of both. It is its own thing.
  • Calls itself the D&D Diablo II Edition right there on the box!
If you accept that this obscure product disproves your absolute claim, turn to page 103.
If you would rather now adjust your stated criteria for an edition so that your absolute claim remains true, turn to page 87.


:cool:
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
I appreciate the enthusiasm in that very absolute claim, but...

View attachment 347837

This 1999 product:
  • Has a rules system clearly developed from the AD&D 2nd Edition rules (so it isn't excluded by your insistence that Basic and its offshoots don't count).
  • Also has a rules system that isn't quite the same as AD&D 2nd Edition or 3rd Edition, but a weird hybrid of both. It is its own thing.
  • Calls itself the D&D Diablo II Edition right there on the box!
If you accept that this obscure product disproves your absolute claim, turn to page 103.
If you would rather now adjust your stated criteria for an edition so that your absolute claim remains true, turn to page 87.


:cool:
Sure, but it's a different iteration of D&D like basic was. ;)

It's not a numbered edition of AD&D.
 

Remove ads

Top