• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Recent content by FrogReaver

  1. FrogReaver

    D&D (2024) 75 Feats -- not nearly enough

    I don’t find feats essential for martials. I’ve played too many featless games for that. Its just many of the good ones benefit them less due to lack of spell slots, already having armor and shields, nearly all the offensive ones being worth far less than +2 str or dex. *while casters are...
  2. FrogReaver

    D&D (2024) 75 Feats -- not nearly enough

    I think feats benefit casters more than martials.
  3. FrogReaver

    D&D (2024) 75 Feats -- not nearly enough

    Sorry. I’ve got to read every option at least 3 times. Maybe 10 and at least do some rudimentary analysis around them.
  4. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    If you don’t use it that way and agree it shouldn’t be then that’s where I’m at. We agree! Maybe I’m misreading your comments but the later (it shouldn’t be used that way) doesn't seem accurate of your views. See above.
  5. FrogReaver

    D&D General Less is More: Why You Can't Get What You Want in D&D

    A few small assumptions allows for it without mind reading or more extensive playtesting than they already do. That the tastes of generally younger fans are mostly the same as the older - there’s probably even survey data to back that up.
  6. FrogReaver

    D&D General Less is More: Why You Can't Get What You Want in D&D

    @Snarf Zagyg I’m curious at how long these masterpieces take you to write?
  7. FrogReaver

    D&D General Less is More: Why You Can't Get What You Want in D&D

    But without the Bard which PC would the DM kill first?
  8. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    Question for you and others that use it this way. How often do you block/ignore the person raising points you mostly agree with when compared to those you don’t?
  9. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    Right. That’s what the implication would be. Don’t ignore head butting sessions at all! But, Even if blocks imply head-butting sessions that doesn’t mean that all head-butting sessions imply blocks. Which means using blocks as a metric for who has the most head-butting sessions would be...
  10. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    So @Umbran introduced the word clique here. You really should address your thoughts on the word to him.
  11. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    Interesting. There probably is a bit of selection bias on my side then. The ones I’m not interacting with currently I’m less likely to realize have blocked me. Where the ones blocking me in the moment I notice instantly. Interesting.
  12. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    Maybe. One question. Why don’t you have me ignored/blocked?
  13. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    I respect that.
  14. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    I wasn’t talking about 7 billion people I’ve never had any interactions with, I was talking about the users of this site. Okay, let me try to approach it this way. Why do you believe that’s true? I believe most blocks occur because two people start butting heads and escalate it from there...
  15. FrogReaver

    The Ethics of Two Way Ignore

    If it really was everybody else or most everyone else I would agree. I dunno that it is though. Far fewer peeps have me blocked than don’t have me blocked. If it was really me wouldn’t almost everyone block me? *pretty sure this applies to everyone.
Top